Helping the Homeless

Last Sunday we had two homeless people come to our service. The first guy talked to TJ and asked him to give him money for a bus ticket. We are not inclined to, or in the habit of, giving money to strangers, but we try to help in any way we can. So TJ told him that not only would he buy the guy a bus ticket, but he would drive him over and purchase it himself. Of course, the guy didn’t really want a bus ticket, he just wanted the money (he forgets that he’s asked us that before).

The second guy asked for money to buy gas for his car. I told him that we were about to get started with our service, but I would be happy to take him to the gas station afterwards if he wanted to stay and worship with us. He actually stayed and listened (though he had his hand up during the sermon almost the whole time).

After the service, I went up to him and said I would be happy to go ahead and take him over to the gas station. He replied and said that he never said he needed any gas. He said, “I said I sleep on a COT, I never said anything about a car.” I know that he did, but again, I’ve experienced this enough times to know that he never wanted gas, he just wanted the money.

Through the whole time, he would make comments to try to get on our nerves. One of our girls came over and he started making racial remarks to her. She came over with a big smile and a warm greeting and was greeted in return with a racial slur. It was uncalled for, but she really did “turn the other cheek”. At every turn, he was met with warmth, love and respect. No one (that I know of) patronized him or looked down on him. He sat in the back and one of our church members went and sat with him.

Before he left, he started getting mad and upset (I think because none of his comments were riling us). He went in to a long story about how he had had bad experiences with churches. He referred to churches that don’t do anything (meaning that they don’t do anything for him) as “church light” and then he insinuated that we were one of those churches. Finally, he started to storm off and I chased after him and said, “So are you thinking that we are a “church light”. He said that we were. I said, “What could we have done differently to make you feel more welcome.” He said that if I had to ask that then I don’t get it. So, I said, “Well, I feel like we tried to help you and you refused us. What else could we do?” He grumbled something and said, “Forget it.” I said, “God bless” as he stormed down the stairs. He mumbled back something and then disappeared out the door.

I believe the whole experience was good for our church. Even in the face of insult, those who encountered this man were gracious and respectful. We say over and over again that we welcome anyone into our church. Sometimes it looks like it’s all college students, but in reality there are married couples, young working professionals, students. Youth, children and older couples, families and the elderly are all welcome at our church. People from all economic status and even religious backgrounds have (and in some cases, still do) come to our church.

I was proud of the way that our church responded to this test of their love and their faith. I am always amazed at how much of an example our church is setting among other believers. All of us are young, but we won’t let anyone look down on us for that.

Jeopardy

I have this strange love for Jeopardy. For me, it’s a challenge to see how many trivia questions I can get right. It’s also a learning experience. You learn things you never thought you would know and never thought you would want to know when you watch Jeopardy.

As much as I like the show, I found myself thinking too hard about it the other day. If you know the idea behind the show, then you know that contestants don’t answer trivia questions. Instead, they are given the answer and they must then respond in the form of the appropriate question. Alex might read the answer, “Locals will snicker (as will I) if you pronounce the second w in this ‘shire’ that Stratford’s in.” The appropriate response would be, “What is Warwickshire?” But have you ever thought about how these answers really come across in response to the questions? Imagine if someone actually asked the question, “What is Warwickshire?” and really wanted to know. If someone responded, “Locals will snicker (as will I) if you pronounce the second w in this ‘shire’ that Stratford’s in.” we would look at them kind of funny. “Oh…so that’s what Warwickshire is…great…thanks, pal…that really…helps.”

There are a lot of people that look at Christianity with the same reaction. They look at Christianity and see thousands of antiquated, blue-screened TV monitors with a bunch of answers to questions that they aren’t asking. We say, “Jesus is the Way” and “He is the propitiation for our sin” but who is asking the question “Who is Jesus”? In an effort to be relevant, some of us have bought the lie that if we just make everything look postmodern and up-to-date we will have an impact on culture. Maybe even taking out some of our stuffy theological answers (since no one wants to hear them anyway) and mixing in some compromise, and a few Q&A’s (or should I say “A&Q’s) about pop culture just to let people know how well we fit in with culture.

As followers of Christ, we have to invest in those who don’t know the right questions to ask rather than just stand on a corner and hand out answers. A tract won’t do it anymore. A three minute conversation through Romans isn’t going to convince anyone who is steeped in their own religion of selfishness. We have to help people ask the right questions. What will it take to get someone to ask, “What must I do to be saved?” For some people, starting with questions like, “Who is God?” is necessary. For others, talking about the deity of Christ is important. For many, starting from creation and, through a long process of discovery, questioning, and struggle, helping them walk through the story of God and the certainty of His presence in the world is a must.

What will it take for someone to ask, “Can God be known?” or “What must I do to be saved?” That’s easy. Follow Christ! Everything He said and did is relevant to our current culture. God’s Word, when it is held as Truth, is relevant to our current culture. It’s only when we start compromising and become hypocritical that people from outside look in and see how weak and anemic we have become in our faith. Standing for God’s Word and proclaiming Jesus’ name, might give us a small taste of persecution, but it will never be irrelevant.

The world is in jeopardy and we are throwing out answers that don’t fit the questions that are being asked. We have to give people a reason to ask the right questions. Maybe the first right question someone will ask on the journey toward a right relationship with God will be, “What is different about him?” or “Why does she have so much joy in her life?” The best thing we have going for us is how different and distinct we are, not how similar we are. Relevance is about difference not uniformity and compromise. It’s about standing for Truth because Truth can’t become outdated. Truth can become unpopular and unfashionable, but it will always be relevant.

“What is Warwickshire?”

Who cares?

Don’t answer that.

Speaking of Postmodernism

I want to take a second and give a few of my impressions on reaching out to a postmodern culture. Since postmodernism is a worldview and not a generational thing, it is possible for an older person to have a postmodern worldview and for a young person to have a modern perspective. Keeping that in mind, we don’t have to throw out all modernistic approaches. There are still millions of people that have a modernistic worldview that need Jesus. The Church needs to once again be a shaper of culture, not just a responder to culture. We have to understand the worldviews of others so that we may know how to respond to each one of them.

Anyway, the first thing I would say about being relevant in a postmodern culture is to not try to be relevant to this culture. Be like Christ. Some will hate that, some will genuinely be drawn to that. We make much of Paul’s “I have become all things…” and make less of “deny yourself, take up your cross, and follow Me.” When it comes to the fitting in, we love to do what we can to make sure no one sees how different we really are. Some would say that to be postmodern, you need to be a pipe-smoking, poetry-loving, coffee-drinking free spirit who believes what he wants. Well, I never said I wanted to be postmodern, I want to bring Jesus to those who are postmodern. I don’t smoke a pipe because my body is a temple of God and I’m not ashamed to say it. When it comes to the self-denial and cross-taking and Christ-following, most emergent church leaders draw back in our fervor because if we really did that, we wouldn’t be “relevant” we wouldn’t be “all things to all people” now would we. If you ask me, many who call themselves emergent have a wrong idea of relevance and misunderstand Paul’s meaning of becoming all things to all men. Maybe they even have a misunderstanding of what the emerging church should be about.

Once you can safely say you are trying to live a sold-out life for Christ, you can move on to other things to reach out to our current culture, like telling your story. Those with a postmodern worldview thrive on metaphors and stories. They are experiential. Don’t just tell it to them, describe it for them. Let them know your experience with Christ. Use a situation that is familiar to them to tell the story of Christ. The PM worldview responds to things like the narratives and the parables that we find in the Bible. Jesus told stories using common elements. Do that.

Another thing you can do is invest relationally. Use every opportunity to sacrifice for someone so that you can build a relationship. There are a couple of people I have been investing in for more than a year now in Boston and we are just now getting to the point where we can talk about spirituality. You won’t start out with a PM with them trusting you. You earn their trust over time.

Those are just a couple of quick things that I’ve discovered, not because it was in some book, but because it is what we are told to do in Scripture. Too often, the emergent church is just a rebellion against all things traditional and structured. Most emerging church leaders had a bad experience with church and so they are starting their own. Rebellion against the status quo shouldn’t be our motivation for starting a church. Doing things differently for the sake of difference and change never helped anyone. The emerging church should be one that desires to follow the teachings of God’s Word and the leading of the Holy Spirit. That’s all any church should ever be. We aren’t going to reach PM’s with anything new if it’s new just for the sake of being new. We are going to reach PM’s because of our passionate pursuit of God, our authentic relationships with our church fellowship, and our energetic desire to reach the world for Christ. Loving God and loving people. As much as the emerging church would say things have changed, there’s not much different about loving God and loving people.

A Church By Any Other Name…

Recently, I read that someone felt “church” should not be used in the name of a church because that word is rejected by our culture as much as the title “Christianity” is. This may set up a rather cliched response, but just because someone gets pricked by a thorn doesn’t mean you must stop calling it a rose. The cliche? A rose by any other name is still a rose. No matter what someone else’s perception is of me, I am still a Christian and I’m still part of the Church. The name “Jesus” has negative connotations for a lot of people, too.

I am all for being relevant to a postmodern culture, but I don’t think we do that by stripping ourselves of everything that looks Christian because people think badly of Christians and we want them to think better of us. Relevance in our current culture is not going to come by creating new terms and titles but by living a pleasing life before God. In the early church, the followers of Christ were identified by the love they had for one another. Where is that in our churches these days? Following Christ, denying ourselves and taking up our crosses is our charge and if God grants us favor before others then let His will be done. He was able to grant Joseph favor before Pharaoh. He granted Daniel and friends favor in a culture that was extremely different than their own. He will grant favor to those who stop acting like they are “of the world” and start living like true followers of Christ. Sometimes, He will even grant us rejection and persecution. As difficult as that sounds, I think we need a little bit more of that in our churches (See 2 Timothy 3:12)

Many “emerging” or “postmodern” church leaders believe that we have to change who we are so that we can fit in, so that we can be a part of the popular crowd, so that we will be respected. We have to stop trying to fit in to culture, and start being salt to the current culture. That doesn’t mean we become a subculture, but that we are shapers of culture. The church used to be the inspiration for art, music, architecture, and many other areas of society. We have become irrelevant in all of those fields because our desperate search for relevance. We have to start living for Christ which may cause us to be rejected, despised, and even persecuted, but we will finally be relevant in the truest sense.

Let's Consult the Membership Roles

Should a church have an official membership? Too often membership is like paying your dues to be in a club. Someone who is a member may not give of their time and money sacrificially because it isn’t expected of them. Just give a certain percentage and you’re in. Come on Sundays and you are in. Volunteer in the nursery or teach a Bible study and you are really committed. I think most of our time and money needs to be spent reaching out to the world and in growing disciples. The typical member of a church may not invest more because they feel their money is being wasted on so much excess. It seems to me that only about 5 or 10% (made up statistic) are really doing anything in the church. When we ask people to subscribe to a minimum standard, there is no motivation to invest their lives in a cause. Imagine if a commander of an army said, we strongly desire for you to give your lives if necessary, but really all we want is about 10%. The ones who give their lives in service to the cause of Christ can’t be commanded by church leadership to do it. The Christian soldier must value the ministry and enjoy sacrificing and giving their life for “the cause”.

A church should give people a chance to be invested in by the church as a part of the Family. They should also give people a chance to invest in the church with their time and money and talents. We should talk about our “members” as family and our “visitors” as friends. So, literally, the church should desire to be a caring community to family and friends. Those who desire to grow as followers of Christ often desire to do that through small groups and one on one discipleship. Others can’t commit as much time during the week, but that doesn’t make them any less a part of the Family. Everyone should do what they can and what they believe God is calling them to do. A pastor should desire to mobilize as many people as possible to be productive and effective for the kingdom of God.

As a result, churches will have “members” who value the body of Christ and who are using and developing their spiritual gifts to bring about unity, love and the knowledge of God in the church and the surrounding community. People don’t want to give their tithe to a cause, they want to give their lives to a cause. They can then be called “members” because of the imagery in the New Testament of being members of God’s household, of being members of the Body, and of being members of God’s family. They aren’t members because they filled out a card, went through the initiation process, and paid their dues. So a person came three Sundays in a row and made 6 contacts? Does that tell me anything about the spiritual life of the “member”? In order to get more members should I get organized and have a system where I call a new person after the first visit, visit them after their second visit, send a card on their birthday, and have a person from the leadership team take them to lunch in the first month? No, instead people in the church should be ready to reach out to people because of the love they have for God and for others. Today’s society won’t put up with scheduled relationships. Membership in a church must be organic and relational calling for complete surrender to Christ and a willingness to abandon all for God, for the Church, and for the culture around us.

Theological Worldview

So I took this quiz at quizfarm.com about my theological worldview. This is not Barna quality, but I found my results pretty interesting. Leave me a comment if you happen to take the test. I would love to hear your results. Here are my results:

You scored as Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan. You are an evangelical in the Wesleyan tradition. You believe that God’s grace enables you to choose to believe in him, even though you yourself are totally depraved. The gift of the Holy Spirit gives you assurance of your salvation, and he also enables you to live the life of obedience to which God has called us. You are influenced heavly by John Wesley and the Methodists.

Evangelical Holiness/Wesleyan

86%

Emergent/Postmodern

64%

Fundamentalist

64%

Classical Liberal

61%

Neo orthodox

57%

Charismatic/Pentecostal

54%

Reformed Evangelical

36%

Modern Liberal

29%

Roman Catholic

0%

What’s your theological worldview?
created with QuizFarm.com