<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HCSB vs. ESV Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/</link>
	<description>Making Disciples :: Planting Churches</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2011 20:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Creitz</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-39479</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Creitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 19:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-39479</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all of your comments on the HCSB. Please check out my new blog &lt;a href=&quot;http://nathancreitz.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://nathancreitz.net&lt;/a&gt; and read my most recent post about &lt;a href=&quot;http://nathancreitz.net/2011/05/26/hcsb-bible-translations-tools-and-tech-for-the-21st-century/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;why I use the HCSB&lt;/a&gt; and hope that all English speakers will too. 
My recent post &lt;a href=&quot;http://nathancreitz.net/2011/05/26/hcsb-bible-translations-tools-and-tech-for-the-21st-century/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bible Translations- Tools and Tech for the 21st Century- HCSB&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all of your comments on the HCSB. Please check out my new blog <a href="http://nathancreitz.net" rel="nofollow">http://nathancreitz.net</a> and read my most recent post about <a href="http://nathancreitz.net/2011/05/26/hcsb-bible-translations-tools-and-tech-for-the-21st-century/" rel="nofollow">why I use the HCSB</a> and hope that all English speakers will too.<br />
My recent post <a href="http://nathancreitz.net/2011/05/26/hcsb-bible-translations-tools-and-tech-for-the-21st-century/" rel="nofollow">Bible Translations- Tools and Tech for the 21st Century- HCSB</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Mockbee</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-31632</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach Mockbee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 23:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-31632</guid>
		<description>I just recently got my HCSB ultrathin in calfskin and the leather is better than my ESV Allan. :) It&#039;s also light-years beyond my ESV cordovan. Not only is the translation better, but the publishers and binders are more advanced. Go figure. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just recently got my HCSB ultrathin in calfskin and the leather is better than my ESV Allan. <img src='http://churchethos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#039;s also light-years beyond my ESV cordovan. Not only is the translation better, but the publishers and binders are more advanced. Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tymetraveler</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-29420</link>
		<dc:creator>Tymetraveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-29420</guid>
		<description>Enjoyed the article and comments.  Have been an avid user of the ESV for the past five years, but recently find myself returning to the NASB, thus discovering the almost ridiculous similarities between it and the ESV.  Almost makes me wonder now was the ESV necessary?  Which brings me to the HCSB.  After looking into it, I am impressed.  I was one of those who swallowed the &quot; HCSB is an SBC bible&quot; propaganda, but since wised up.  I am a Presbyterian who once was Southern Baptist, and I think I am going to buy my first copy of the HCSB soon! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed the article and comments.  Have been an avid user of the ESV for the past five years, but recently find myself returning to the NASB, thus discovering the almost ridiculous similarities between it and the ESV.  Almost makes me wonder now was the ESV necessary?  Which brings me to the HCSB.  After looking into it, I am impressed.  I was one of those who swallowed the &quot; HCSB is an SBC bible&quot; propaganda, but since wised up.  I am a Presbyterian who once was Southern Baptist, and I think I am going to buy my first copy of the HCSB soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattie Buzek</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-27394</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattie Buzek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 09:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-27394</guid>
		<description>Hello, for some reason when i place your feed into google reader, it won?t get the job done. Are you able to give me the Rss link simply to be certain I?m using the most appropriate 1? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, for some reason when i place your feed into google reader, it won?t get the job done. Are you able to give me the Rss link simply to be certain I?m using the most appropriate 1?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jools</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-23624</link>
		<dc:creator>Jools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-23624</guid>
		<description>Ooops. Further to my comment above, that was correct, but was for study bibles.  
 
Here in Jan 2011, for both unit sales and dollar sales, the ESV is at position 5, and the HCSB is below it at position 6. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooops. Further to my comment above, that was correct, but was for study bibles.  </p>
<p>Here in Jan 2011, for both unit sales and dollar sales, the ESV is at position 5, and the HCSB is below it at position 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jools</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-23623</link>
		<dc:creator>Jools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-23623</guid>
		<description>Here we are a while later (Jan 2010) and I just took a look at the best-seller list. The ESV is #3 and the HCSB has completely dropped off the list.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we are a while later (Jan 2010) and I just took a look at the best-seller list. The ESV is #3 and the HCSB has completely dropped off the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PJ Tibayan</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-23260</link>
		<dc:creator>PJ Tibayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-23260</guid>
		<description>&quot;I predict that we will see the HCSB as the #1 Bible translation of choice within the next year.&quot;  I wish this were true.  Is it #1 or even #2 today? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I predict that we will see the HCSB as the #1 Bible translation of choice within the next year.&quot;  I wish this were true.  Is it #1 or even #2 today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Problem of Choosing a Good Bible Translation &#124; ChurchETHOS</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator>The Problem of Choosing a Good Bible Translation &#124; ChurchETHOS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-4698</guid>
		<description>[...] you speak English, I recommend the Holman Christian Standard Bible. I&#8217;ve written about that here and here. It&#8217;s the best of the modern translations because it is accurate, it is readable, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you speak English, I recommend the Holman Christian Standard Bible. I&#8217;ve written about that here and here. It&#8217;s the best of the modern translations because it is accurate, it is readable, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 06:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-368</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m really late to this discussion, but I wanted to offer a brief follow up to Keith&#039;s comments. 
 
I couldn&#039;t agree more that every translation is biased in some ways. I also would LOVE for everyone to be able to know the original languages and study the Bible there. However, that&#039;s not the case we&#039;re in, so we&#039;re stuck translating. Besides, even if we DID know the languages, we would still have to translate it into our own in order to talk about Scripture at all. Plus, even people who know the languages disagree on what the meaning is. 
 
All that to say, knowing the languages isn&#039;t the answer. (And I&#039;m not saying that because I&#039;m afraid of doing the hard work. I&#039;ve taken 7 years of Greek and 3 years of Hebrew). 
 
For what it&#039;s worth. I&#039;m also a Presbyterian. Our church officially uses the ESV, but I always take my HCSB with me too. It&#039;s funny to hear our pastor explain a verse and then see that that&#039;s exactly how the HCSB translated it in the first place. :) 
 
I think ESV and HCSB are both good translations, I just prefer the non-archaic forms of the HCSB (sorry, Andy, but I can&#039;t stomach archaic English for long). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#039;m really late to this discussion, but I wanted to offer a brief follow up to Keith&#039;s comments. </p>
<p>I couldn&#039;t agree more that every translation is biased in some ways. I also would LOVE for everyone to be able to know the original languages and study the Bible there. However, that&#039;s not the case we&#039;re in, so we&#039;re stuck translating. Besides, even if we DID know the languages, we would still have to translate it into our own in order to talk about Scripture at all. Plus, even people who know the languages disagree on what the meaning is. </p>
<p>All that to say, knowing the languages isn&#039;t the answer. (And I&#039;m not saying that because I&#039;m afraid of doing the hard work. I&#039;ve taken 7 years of Greek and 3 years of Hebrew). </p>
<p>For what it&#039;s worth. I&#039;m also a Presbyterian. Our church officially uses the ESV, but I always take my HCSB with me too. It&#039;s funny to hear our pastor explain a verse and then see that that&#039;s exactly how the HCSB translated it in the first place. <img src='http://churchethos.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I think ESV and HCSB are both good translations, I just prefer the non-archaic forms of the HCSB (sorry, Andy, but I can&#039;t stomach archaic English for long).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://churchethos.com/book-review/hcsb-vs-esv-update/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchethos.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-367</guid>
		<description>I own the ESV Study Bible and the HCSB Apologetics Study Bible.  As far as translation goes, I actually prefer the slightly archaic forms in the ESV, as they lend a somewhat poetic quality.   (For similar reasons, I have always been fond of the NKJV.)   Both are stellar translations, though, and I&#039;m hoping they chip away at the mediocre NIV, which is still sitting pretty at #1 on those bestseller lists... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own the ESV Study Bible and the HCSB Apologetics Study Bible.  As far as translation goes, I actually prefer the slightly archaic forms in the ESV, as they lend a somewhat poetic quality.   (For similar reasons, I have always been fond of the NKJV.)   Both are stellar translations, though, and I&#039;m hoping they chip away at the mediocre NIV, which is still sitting pretty at #1 on those bestseller lists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

